As she did her research, she found that her second great grandfather and his wife had both died at relatively young ages. He was listed with his parents in the 1850 census and then with his wife and two children in the 1860 census. By the 1870 census the two children from the 1860 census and what appear to be two additional children are found in the grandparents’ household and no record can be found for the parents.
The dilemma is proving that one of the two additional children found in 1870—one being her great grandfather—was a son. Currently, the evidence is circumstantial.
Possible solutions to this brickwall would be to find the father’s will and determine if the child is mentioned. Another possibility is to find guardianship papers likely indicating the grandfather as the guardian of the four grandchildren, children of his deceased son. A record like this would actually prove two generations: children to father and father to grandfather.
If these records aren’t available, tying the siblings together could help prove the two younger were children of the same parents. An obituary for one of the older children might provide information such as, “survived by brother George of Missouri.” An obituary might list that he was the child of John, who died when he was only 6. Another possiblity would be to find an obituary of the father's brothers or sisters to see if any mention is made of him.
This obituary lists both his father and what apparently is his maternal grandfather's name as well. The balance of the obituary lists that he was survived by his mother as well as things he accomplished in his life. This obituary would have broken a brick wall.
Some marriage records provide the names of parents, but that would be a rare, but choice find.
Never give up, but keep pursuing information about the generations involved. Some random bit of information might tie the generations together.
No comments:
Post a Comment